How Victorian Women Sewed

by Mimi Matthews

“Light or fancy needlework often forms a portion of the evening’s recreation for the ladies of the household…”  — Beeton’s Book of Household Management, 1861.

During the 19th century, women were rarely idle in their spare moments. Many preferred instead to occupy themselves with a bit of sewing.  This sewing generally fell into two broad categories: plain work and fancy work. Plain work was used to make or mend simple articles of clothing., while fancy work—which included knitting, crochet, and embroidery—was used in a more decorative sense. A young lady skilled at both plain and fancy work could not only repair her current clothing, she could design and sew stylish new pieces to supplement her wardrobe. As an 1873 issue of Harper’s Bazaar explains:

“…we have met with cases where the frivolity of fancy-work has been turned to excellent profit, where young ladies who had learned its arts in their idle moments practiced it to provide themselves with the wardrobe that their restricted purses could never buy.”

bottompix4 5b31aCrochet Garter, Madame Gouband’s Crochet Book, 1871.

Lady’s magazines of the day featured countless patterns for everything from knitted reticules and petticoats to crocheted corsets and garters. Patterns for baby clothes were also popular, as were patterns for home goods such as doilies, antimacassars, and accessories for pets. The end results of sewing these patterns could provide a lady with much needed clothing and household items for herself and her family.  Or, if she was entrepreneurial, it could provide her with a steady income. Harper’s Bazaar reports:

“We have known of a still more striking case where a widow has paid off the mortgage on her city house, and supported herself and child for many years, almost altogether with her swift crochet needle.”

knittedpetticoat a2e50Knitted Petticoat and Crochet Shoulder Cape, Harper’s Bazaar, 1897.

More than just a practical skill, in marriageable young women of the middle and upper classes, fancy work was considered to be an accomplishment.  It was taught to young girls both at home and at school and, by the end of the century, was even being offered in women’s colleges. According to author Christine Bayles Kortsch in her 2009 book Dress Culture in Late Victorian Women’s Fiction:

“In the latter half of the century, women’s colleges and art schools offered professional instruction in fancy work, particularly embroidery.”

Once wed, the sewing skills learned by middle and upper class girls did not fall by the wayside. Newly married ladies continued to apply themselves to fancy work or to sewing clothes for the poor.  As for plain work, this usually became the province of the lady’s maid. In Isabella Beeton’s 1861 Book of Household Management, for example, she writes:

“Plain work will probably be one of the lady’s-maid’s chief employments.”

embroideredc ollar faa6eEmbroidered Collar Pattern, Godey’s Lady’s Book, 1855.

For poorer girls, sewing was taught at various working-class day schools, often at the expense of skills such as writing and arithmetic. The reasoning behind this is best expressed in the following words from the Bampton National School, as quoted by Kortsch:

“Needlework, Knitting, &c. will form part of their constant employment for the purpose of training them up in habits of useful industry, and contributing to the support of the School.”

bottompix3 4a161Crochet Cape for Elderly Lady, Harper’s Bazaar, 1871.

The invention of the sewing machine in the mid-19th century did little to improve the lot of poor working seamstresses. Instead, it led to mass production of clothing in factories where the working conditions were often quite grim—and sometimes even fatal. In his 2001 book  Twelve Inventions Which Changed America, author Gerhard Falk goes so far as to claim that, for the poor:

“…the sewing machine became a new taskmaster, a slave driver, and an instrument of degradation, misery, and desperation.”

bottompix2 be238Crocheted Girl’s Corset, Babyhood Magazine, 1887.

For those middle and upper class ladies at home, however, the sewing machine was a useful tool. Able to make 250 stitches per minute in its earliest incarnation, it greatly sped up the process of sewing straight seams and was—as author Ella Rodman Church states in her 1882 book The Home Needle—a “valuable aid in lightening the sewing of a household.” Even so, Church goes on to advise that the sewing machine is no replacement for plain and fancy work, writing:

“…[It] is mechanical in its execution, and done according to rules that have little connection with needle-work.”

bottompix1 fa249Dog Muzzle Crochet, Godey’s Lady’s Book, 1868.

Despite many modern advances, plain and fancy work—of the sort so popular in the Victorian era—are still around today. Countless women all over the world spend their free moments on knitting, crochet, or embroidery.  Not because it makes them more marriageable and not because it is a necessary life skill, but because they enjoy it. To be fair, I believe there were many who enjoyed it in the 19th century as well, however, I must say that I am quite thankful that it is no longer a prerequisite to being considered an accomplished lady.


Top image: Portraits in the Countryside by Gustave Caillebotte, 1876

This post originally appeared on and is reprinted here with permission.

More from BUST

In 1861, 25-Year-Old Isabella Beeton Changed Cookbooks Forever

In The Victorian Era, Babies Wore (Sometimes Deadly) Veils

How Victorian Women Kept Those Fancy Dresses Clean


You may also like

Get the print magazine.

The best of BUST in your inbox!

Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter

About Us

Founded in 1993, BUST is the inclusive feminist lifestyle trailblazer offering a unique mix of humor, female-focused entertainment, uncensored personal stories, and candid reporting that tells the truth about women’s lives.

©2023 Street Media LLC.  All Right Reserved.