Quantcast
The Lifting Of A Temple Ban On Menstruating Women Is Dividing India
×

Warning

JCacheStorageFile::_deleteFolder JFolder: :delete: Could not delete folder. Path: /var/www/vhosts/bust.com/httpdocs/cache/mod_menu

800px Wall Stencil for Womens Equality Varanasi Uttar Pradesh India 12480151013 3fd5e

The Sabarimala Temple in Kerala, a Southern Indian state, has been the center of much contention over the past few months. For centuries, the Sabarimala Temple has banned menstruating women, typically between the ages of 10 and 50, from entering or coming close to the sacred structure dedicated to the Hindu god, Lord Ayyappa. According to NPR’s Lauren Frayer, Lord Ayyappa is “a Hindu god who devotees believe is celibate and cannot have contact with women of menstruating age. Some believe that’s because such women are impure. Others believe it’s because they are of childbearing age—fertile and thus a temptation to Lord Ayyappa.”

India Today reports that on September 28, 2018, the Indian Supreme Court ruled the Sabarimala Temple ban on menstruating women is unconstitutional because it's a violation of women’s right to equality and their right to worship. The temple's ban was legally lifted on October 17, but because of thousands of protesters in front of the temple, women of a menstruating age have been unable to enter the worshipping site.

ADVERTISEMENT

The New York Times reports that on New Year’s Day, millions of women, led by Kerala’s Communist government, formed a human chain that stretched almost 400 miles from the north of the state all the way to the southern capital of Thiruvananthapuram. According to India Today, on January 2, with the support from the demonstration, two women—Bindu, age 44, and Kanaka, age 42,—entered Sabarimala at 3:45 am to worship.

Police were ordered to provide protection to any woman who desired to enter the temple. According to a local news source, The Indian Express, Bindu and Kanaka were dressed in all black and covered their heads, as they were escorted by police officers through a back service entrance, instead of the 18 sacred steps traditionally used by worshippers.

After the women entered the temple, news site Mathrubhumi reports that protesters blocked traffic, vandalized a government office, and pelted police with stones, which caused the police to fire tear gas into the crowds. Bindu and Kanaka exited the temple, and priests at Sabarimala immediately closed the temple for “purification rituals,” which, according to The Indian Express, usually occur after blood is spilled or a child urinates accidentally.

The conflict surrounding the Sabarimala ban is a complicated one, because it is gendered, political, and complex due to India’s caste systems and history. According to NPR, the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, the political party of India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, believes women visiting the temple to be a “conspiracy by the atheist rulers to destroy the Hindu temples.” Strong devotees of the Hindu religion see the visit and the lifting of the ban as a violation of customs, while Kerala’s Communist government and feminists find the ban to be a violation of women's rights.

The New York Times reports that Sabarimala devotees pride themselves in being progressive, not exclusionary, because Ayyappa's shrine is nominally open to all religions; this particular temple has not been known to practice caste exclusion; and priests have said they will admit transgender people who do not have a menstrual cycle. To Sabarimala devotees, this is not a discrimination issue; the partial ban is deeply rooted in Hindu tradition and customs. The New York Times noted the existence of a campaign started by female supporters of the ban called #ReadyToWait—this group of women respect the ban as a religious tradition, and they see no issue with waiting for menopause to enter the temple.

Free Download: 
A Feminist Guide to the Resistance

Don't give up the fight! Featuring inspiring interviews with resistance leaders; how-tos on community organizing, running for office, and much, more. Plus, get the latest from BUST.

Due to protests and multiple petitions, according to The Times of India, the Supreme Court has scheduled a review of their decision for later this month.

Image: commons.wikimedia.org

More from BUST

Congress Let The Violence Against Women Act Expire Over The Holidays

Everything You Need To Know About The Women's March 2019

Rep. Rashida Tlaib Of Michigan Is A Thobe-Wearing, Swearing Inspiration 

Allie Lawrence graduated from the University of Puget Sound with a B.A. in Theatre Arts and English. She loves dogs, laughter, and The Great British Bake Off. Feel free to follow her on Twitter @0riginalliety.

Support Feminist Media! During these troubling political times, independent feminist media is more vital than ever. If our bold, uncensored reporting on women’s issues is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $25, $50, or whatever you can afford, to protect and sustain BUST.com. Thanks so much—we can’t spell BUST without U.

SUPPORT FEMINIST MEDIA

If our bold, uncensored reporting on women's issues is important to you, please consider making a donation.

donate button