Quantcast

 Neil Gorsuch and Donald Trump

It’s amazing how people still seem to think they can brazenly plagiarize others' work and get away with it. But what’s even more amazing is that they actually do keep getting away with it. Over the last nine months, there have been a number of instances of poorly-concealed copying by this unqualified, unprofessional, unethical team. 

It’s a horrible example to be setting for those still in school or college — because hey, if the President, First Lady, and nominee for Secretary of Education of the United States can do it, why shouldn’t you?

So, kids, if you are thinking of shamelessly plagiarizing, here are a few quick lessons from Donald Trump’s team as to how to do it right.

Lesson 1: Copy from your friend, and then get them to say it's okay with them.

The latest (alleged) perpetrator in this line up of cheaters is Trump's Supreme Court Nominee, Neil Gorsuch. Last night Buzzfeed reported that sections of Gorsuch's 2006 book and one of his articles on euthanasia appear to have been lifted from a 1984 article on the same subject by lawyer Abigail Lawlis Kuzma, with only slight changes to the wording and (of course) zero attribution. The numerous examples Buzzfeed provides are deliciously damning, especially this 33-word sentence with only one word changed: "the child died on the sixth day after he was born while the [Gorsuch: a] guardian ad litem was on his way to Washington, D.C., to appeal the case to the United States Supreme Court." He also appears to have copied whole sentences from the work of euthanasia activist Ian Dowbiggin, per Politico

Unsurprisingly, the White House is denying any fault on the part of Gorsuch, even though this is clearly plagiarism and plagiarism is clearly wrong.

Kuzma has not responded to requests for comment, but provided Buzzfeed with the following statement via the White House:

"I have reviewed both passages and do not see an issue here, even though the language is similar. These passages are factual, not analytical in nature, framing both the technical legal and medical circumstances of the ‘Baby/Infant Doe’ case that occurred in 1982. Given that these passages both describe the basic facts of the case, it would have been awkward and difficult for Judge Gorsuch to have used different language."

(Academic integrity experts interviewed by Politico appeared to disagree, saying it ranged from mere sloppiness to this condemnation from Professor Rebecca Moore Howard: "Each of the individual incidents constitutes a violation of academic ethics. I've never seen a college plagiarism code that this would not be in violation of.")

But because this is Trump's America, there probably won't be any consequences for Gorsuch. Mitch McConnell is expected to force through the judge's nomination by a simple majority vote on Friday. Because who needs standards am I right?

Lesson 2: If you’re going to plagiariaze, change more than a few words. And don’t be the nominee for Secretary of Education.

Betsy, Betsy, Betsy.

Betsy DeVos, Trump’s Secretary of Education, appeared to have plagiarized parts of her written answers to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions — and for a time it looked likely to derail her nomination.

Betsy Devos.tifBetsy Devos at her confirmation hearing (via Wikipedia Commons)

As the Washington Post pointed out, DeVos’ wording (on a question about bullying of LGBT students) bore remarkable similarities to those of Vanita Gupta, head of Obama's Civil Rights Division at the Justice Department, in a May 2016 press release.

Spot the difference:
"Every child deserves to attend school in a safe, supportive environment where they can learn, thrive, and grow.”
"Every child deserves to attend school in a safe, supportive environment that allows them to thrive and grow."

The latter belongs to Gupta, while the former appears in DeVos' answers. Surely — I hear you ask — DeVos must have used this quote, which is only marginally different, to express agreement with/acknowledge Gupta? Wait — I hear you remember — of course she didn’t.

Committee Democrats said that other parts of her answers also appeared to be copied and pasted, and vowed to investigate the plagiarism further. Her friends in the White House called the criticisms “character assassination.” Maybe you should try that if you get caught plagiarizing your next school assignment?

As you may remember, DeVos' confirmation came right down to the line, the closest of any of Trump's cabinet, with Vice President Pence required to cast the tiebreaking vote. That said, that might not be because of the plagiarism. That might because she said we should allow guns in schools due to "potential grizzlies."

Rest in peace, academic integrity/potential grizzlies.

Lesson 3: If you’re going to plagiarize, plagiarize someone successful, I guess?

In keeping with this administration’s low standards of originality, “Make America Great Again” was not exactly the most innovative of slogans.

When Ronald Reagan ran for President in 1980, his campaign slogan was “Let’s make America great again.”

Lets Make America Great Again Reagan3Via Wikipedia Commons

I Agree To See, a collection of political ads both past and present, writes that the slogan was about “using the Nation’s economic woes to stir a sense of patriotism among the electorate.” Sound familiar? Trump, like Reagan, brilliantly capitalized on people’s financial insecurities, while being the candidate whose “trickle down” economic policies were least likely to help them.

Trump, for his part, claims he did not know about Reagan's use of the slogan (despite the fact he was 34 years old at the time) and also pointed out in the Washington Post that Reagan “did not trademark it.”

Reagan was a pretty good choice to steal from. For one, he’s dead. For another, he won two of the biggest electoral college margins in history, the 5th and 9th largest. Trump’s “landslide” is 46th. Out of 58. He also lost the popular vote. By 2.8 million votes.

So yeah. Steal from the really, really popular dead guy.

Lesson 4: Don’t plagiarize your more popular predecessor.

People will notice. People will make fun of you. People will laugh.

Melania Trump learned this the hard way, when people noticed the similarities between her 2016 Republican Convention Aspiring First Lady SpeechTM and Michelle Obama’s 2008 Democratic Convention Aspiring First Lady SpeechTM.

I mean, “work hard and you can achieve anything” is a pretty standard message. But Melania. Girl. Change a few more of the words.

Screen Shot 2017 02 01 at 4.05.34 pmThe bolded parts are word-for-word. The rest are not, but are essentially the same.

The message she stole don’t even apply in her context. She and her husband hadn’t just overcome racial barriers through hard work to secure a historic nomination. And her husband was certainly not all about treating people with respect.

Look, steal her values. Steal her backstory. But if you’re going to steal your predecessor's literal words, Melania, you better make damn sure she’s not more popular than you. No one is ever gonna let this one go.

Screen Shot 2017 02 01 at 4.25.00 pmVia Twitter/@tinacos 

Lesson 5: If a large part of your career is built on plagiarism, don’t open yourself up to national scrutiny.

When Trump selected conservative columnist Monica Crowley for a high-profile communications role at the National Security Council, people began digging into her past.

They quickly discovered she had plagiarized large parts of her 2012 book, What The (Bleep) Just Happened?. CNN found and reported on “upwards of 50 examples of plagiarism from numerous sources, including the copying with minor changes of news articles, other columnists, think tanks, and Wikipedia” with no notes or bibliography.

Much like DeVos, Trump’s team accused reports of her plagiarism as being a “politically motivated attack,” because they don’t seem to understand that plagiarism is an objective misdeed. Ironically, Crowley’s plagiarized book was itself a “politically motivated attack” on Obama. Politico then exposed the fact that large parts of her PhD dissertation were also plagiarized. Readers also found “striking similarities” in her 1999 Wall Street Journal column to another outlet's article, which the paper quickly apologized for. But her career continued. Because plagiarism isn’t a career-ruiner if you’re a conservative commentator!

Trump stood by her as these instances mounted, but Crowley — “after much reflection” — decided to forgo White House post, which would have involved her overseeing certain speeches that would definitely not have been plagiarized.

Screen Shot 2017 02 01 at 6.16.49 pmImage via Twitter/@MonicaCrowley

Honestly, if you are sitting on a house of cards of plagiarism, maybe, um, don’t go for high profile roles in the Trump Administration. Them journalists. They’ll get you. 

Lesson 6: Don’t plagiarize the bad guy.

We should all be pretty annoyed that parts of Donald Trump’s inauguration speech-- a speech few people ever get to deliver-- appears to have been plagiarized. But we should be downright disturbed that he (and Bannon, it's believed) chose to plagiarize a Batman villain.

Jezebel was first to notice that passages of Trump’s speech were eerily similar to Bane’s in The Dark Knight Rises.

Trump/Bane: “But we are transferring power from Washington D.C. and giving it back to you... the people. For too long a small group in our nation’s capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost."

Bane/Trump: “We take Gotham from the corrupt! The rich! The oppressors of generations who have kept you down with myths of opportunity, and we give it back to you... the people.”

Listen to the intonation of “you... the people” in each.

We can’t say for sure that Trump (and/or Bannon) plagiarized these lines from The Dark Knight Rises. But Bane is known to be an alt-right hero, “an oft-cited character within the white nationalist community,” according to Quartz. Much like one Donald Trump.

This shouldn’t be okay with anyone. Bane is the bad guy. Anyone with basic film literacy and a sound moral compass gets this. Children understand this. What subconscious point are they trying to make here?

Why couldn’t he have just plagiarized the Mean Girls speech? I would have been fine with that.

Just don’t channel a supervillain.

 

Top image via Wikipedia Commons

More from BUST

Here Are All The Reasons Why Betsy DeVos Is Bad News For Bears

Here's One Way Trump Could Be Impeached

President Obama Sub-Subtweets: Keep It Up Everyone

 

 

Support Feminist Media! During these troubling political times, independent feminist media is more vital than ever. If our bold, uncensored reporting on women’s issues is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $25, $50, or whatever you can afford, to protect and sustain BUST.com. Thanks so much—we can’t spell BUST without U.
Facebook_websiteTwitter_websitePinterest_websiteRSS_websiteTumblr_websiteIG_website

Search

unnamed 2 copy copy

Upcoming Events

Locker Room Talk: Confronting Sexual Assault in the Age of Trump
Sun Apr 23 @ 5:00PM - 08:00PM
Labors of Love
Fri Apr 28 @ 7:00PM -
People's Climate March
Sat Apr 29 @12:00AM - 11:00PM
(NYC) BUST Craftacular Spring
Sat May 06 @11:00AM - 07:00PM
(NYC) BUST Craftacular Spring
Sun May 07 @11:00AM - 07:00PM